Part (i)
8 marks
Since , by the chain rule,
Using the identity ,
Since ,
Approach
Rather than differentiating afresh, we differentiate the shown result using the chain rule, treating as a function of and writing in terms of again each time. This keeps every derivative expressed in and only, as the question asks.
Differentiating with respect to ,
Since ,
Differentiating again with respect to ,
Substituting ,
Part (ii)
Approach
The Maclaurin series needs . Since , evaluating at first lets us substitute a single number into the part (i) results instead of re-differentiating.
When , .
Substituting into the part (i) results,
Using the Maclaurin series ,
Part (iii)
3 marks
Approach
is of part (i) with and , so instead of expanding from scratch we substitute these values into the part (i) results, this time with .
Taking , in part (i), . Substituting ,
Note: , so the term vanishes; the first two non-zero terms are the and terms.
Using the Maclaurin series with , , , ,
| To check your answer: by GC, expanding to this order gives , matching the first two non-zero terms found here. ✓ |
the first two non-zero terms are .