· H2 Mathematics — Ten-Year Series, worked ← All 10 questions

2017 A-Level · Paper 2 · Question 7

2017 H2 Maths Paper 2, Question 7

Hypothesis testing 10 marks central limit theorem
Download Paper 2 solutions (PDF)

Part (i)

1 mark

A sample is random in this context if every biscuit bar produced that day has an equal chance of being selected for the sample, and bars are selected independently of one another.

Part (ii)

2 marks

Since n=40n = 40, Σ(x−32)=−7.7\Sigma(x - 32) = - 7.7 and Σ(x−32)2=11.05\Sigma(x - 32)^{2} = 11.05,

x‾=32+Σ(x−32)n\overline{x} = 32 + \frac{\Sigma(x - 32)}{n}
=32+−7.740= 32 + \frac{- 7.7}{40}
=31.8075= 31.8075
s2=1n−1[Σ(x−32)2−(Σ(x−32))2n]s^{2} = \frac{1}{n - 1}\left\lbrack \Sigma(x - 32)^{2} - \frac{\left( \Sigma(x - 32) \right)^{2}}{n} \right\rbrack
=139[11.05−(−7.7)240]= \frac{1}{39}\left\lbrack 11.05 - \frac{( - 7.7)^{2}}{40} \right\rbrack
=9.567539= \frac{9.5675}{39}
=0.245 (3 s.f.)= 0.245\ \left( 3\ \text{s.f.} \right)

∴\therefore the unbiased estimate of the population mean is 31.8075 g31.8075\ g, and the unbiased estimate of the population variance is 0.245 g20.245\ g^{2} (3 s.f.).

Part (iii)

5 marks

Let μ\mu be the population mean mass, in grams, of biscuit bars produced that day.

We test

H0:μ=32H1:μ≠32H_{0}:\mu = 32\quad\quad H_{1}:\mu \neq 32

at the 1%1\% significance level.

Approach

The population distribution of masses is not given, but n=40n = 40 is large, so by the Central Limit Theorem X‾\overline{X} is approximately normal even though the population variance is unknown (and is estimated by s2s^{2}). This justifies a zz-test.

Under H0H_{0}, since n=40n = 40 is large, by the Central Limit Theorem

X‾∼N(32, s2n) approximately, where s2=0.24533 (5 s.f.)\overline{X} \sim N\left( 32,\ \frac{s^{2}}{n} \right)\ \text{approximately, where}\ s^{2} = 0.24533\ \left( 5\ \text{s.f.} \right)

Using a zz-test,

z=x‾−32s2/nz = \frac{\overline{x} - 32}{\sqrt{s^{2}/n}}
=31.8075−320.24533/40= \frac{31.8075 - 32}{\sqrt{0.24533/40}}
=−2.458 (4 s.f.)  (by GC)= - 2.458\ \left( 4\ \text{s.f.} \right)\ \ \text{(by GC)}

By GC, the pp-value is 0.01400.0140 (3 s.f.).

Since p-value=0.0140>0.01p\text{-value} = 0.0140 > 0.01, we do not reject H0H_{0}.

∴\therefore at the 1%1\% level of significance, there is insufficient evidence that the mean mass of biscuit bars differs from 3232 grams, i.e. no evidence against the claim on the packets.

Part (iv)

2 marks

Explanation: No need to know the population distribution because n=40n = 40 is large, so by the Central Limit Theorem the sample mean X‾\overline{X} is approximately normally distributed whatever the underlying distribution of the individual bar masses is. This means the test in (iii) is valid (approximately) regardless of the population distribution.

This is how we mark, and how we teach.

Every Ten-Year Series question, worked in full, with the reasoning written out and the traps named.

Find out more