· H2 Mathematics — Ten-Year Series, worked ← All 10 questions

2018 A-Level · Paper 2 · Question 5

2018 H2 Maths Paper 2, Question 5

Hypothesis testing 7 marks test of a mean
Download Paper 2 solutions (PDF)

Part (i)

2 marks

Since the distribution of the time to failure of an individual fan is not stated to be normal, we cannot assume that X‾\overline{X} is normally distributed for a small sample. Taking a sample of at least 3030 fans lets the manager invoke the Central Limit Theorem, so that the sample mean X‾\overline{X} is approximately normally distributed whatever the distribution of an individual fan’s time to failure, which is what the hypothesis test requires.

The fans should be chosen randomly (e.g. by simple random sampling) from the manufacturer’s production, so that the sample is representative of all such fans and the test is not biased by, say, testing only fans from one batch or one production run.

Part (ii)

2 marks

Let μ\mu be the population mean time to failure, in hours, of this type of fan (under the accelerated testing procedure). The quality control manager suspects the MTTF is less than the claimed value, so the test is

H0: μ=65000H_{0}:\ \mu = 65000
H1: μ<65000H_{1}:\ \mu < 65000

carried out at the 5%5\% significance level.

Part (iii)

3 marks

Approach

We are not given the variance used in the test — instead we are told the conclusion of the test (do not reject H0H_{0}), and asked to work backwards for the range of variance values consistent with that conclusion. The population variance is unknown, so let σ2\sigma^{2} denote the (unbiased) estimate of it used in the test statistic. Since n=43n = 43 is large, by the Central Limit Theorem, under H0H_{0},

Z=X‾−65000σ/43∼N(0, 1) approximately.Z = \frac{\overline{X} - 65000}{\sigma/\sqrt{43}} \sim N(0,\ 1)\ \text{approximately.}

This is a lower-tailed test at the 5%5\% level, so H0H_{0} is rejected if the test statistic z≤−1.6449z \leq - 1.6449 (by GC, the critical value is −invNorm(0.95)=−1.6449- invNorm(0.95) = - 1.6449, i.e. z0.05=1.6449z_{0.05} = 1.6449).

Since the manager finds no reason to reject H0H_{0}, the test statistic must satisfy z>−1.6449z > - 1.6449. Using x‾=64230\overline{x} = 64230,

z=64230−65000σ/43=−77043σ.z = \frac{64230 - 65000}{\sigma/\sqrt{43}} = \frac{- 770\sqrt{43}}{\sigma}.

Substituting into the non-rejection condition:

−77043σ>−1.6449\frac{- 770\sqrt{43}}{\sigma} > - 1.6449
⇒77043σ<1.6449 (multiplying by −1, so the inequality reverses)\Rightarrow \frac{770\sqrt{43}}{\sigma} < 1.6449\ \text{(multiplying by } - 1\text{, so the inequality reverses)}
⇒σ>770431.6449\Rightarrow \sigma > \frac{770\sqrt{43}}{1.6449}
⇒σ>3069.7 (by GC).\Rightarrow \sigma > 3069.7\ \text{(by GC).}

Since σ>0\sigma > 0, squaring preserves the inequality:

σ2>3069.72\sigma^{2} > {3069.7}^{2}
⇒σ2>9.42×106 (3 s.f.).\Rightarrow \sigma^{2} > 9.42 \times 10^{6}\ \text{(3 s.f.).}
To check your answer: at σ2=9.42×106\sigma^{2} = 9.42 \times 10^{6} exactly, z=−7709.42×106/43=−1.645z = \frac{- 770}{\sqrt{9.42 \times 10^{6}/43}} = - 1.645, right at the critical value; a larger variance gives a zz closer to 00, which is further from the critical region, consistent with not rejecting H0H_{0}. ✓

Note: there is no upper bound on σ2\sigma^{2} — as the variance used increases, the test statistic moves towards 00 and stays out of the (lower-tailed) critical region, so every larger variance is also consistent with not rejecting H0H_{0}.

∴\therefore the variance used in calculating the test statistic satisfies σ2>9.42×106 hours2\sigma^{2} > 9.42 \times 10^{6}\ \text{hours}^{2} (3 s.f.).

This is how we mark, and how we teach.

Every Ten-Year Series question, worked in full, with the reasoning written out and the traps named.

Find out more