· H2 Mathematics — Ten-Year Series, worked ← All 11 questions

2019 A-Level · Paper 2 · Question 4

2019 H2 Maths Paper 2, Question 4

Maclaurin series 11 marks repeated differentiation
Download Paper 2 solutions (PDF)

Part (i)

7 marks

Let f(x)=sec⁡2xf(x) = \sec 2x. Differentiating using the chain rule, with ddu(sec⁡u)=sec⁡utan⁡u\frac{d}{du}\left( \sec u \right) = \sec u\tan u and u=2xu = 2x,

f′(x)=2sec⁡2xtan⁡2xf'(x) = 2\sec 2x\tan 2x

Differentiating again, using the product rule on 2sec⁡2xtan⁡2x2\sec 2x\tan 2x,

f′′(x)f''(x)
=2[(2sec⁡2xtan⁡2x)tan⁡2x+sec⁡2x(2sec⁡22x)]= 2\left\lbrack \left( 2\sec 2x\tan 2x \right)\tan 2x + \sec 2x\left( 2\sec^{2}2x \right) \right\rbrack
=4sec⁡2xtan⁡22x+4sec⁡32x= 4\sec 2x\tan^{2}2x + 4\sec^{3}2x

At x=0x = 0: sec⁡0=1\sec 0 = 1 and tan⁡0=0\tan 0 = 0, so

f(0)=1,f′(0)=2(1)(0)=0,f′′(0)=4(1)(0)+4(1)=4f(0) = 1,\quad\quad f'(0) = 2(1)(0) = 0,\quad\quad f''(0) = 4(1)(0) + 4(1) = 4

Using the Maclaurin expansion f(x)≈f(0)+f′(0)x+f′′(0)2!x2f(x) \approx f(0) + f'(0)x + \frac{f''(0)}{2!}x^{2},

f(x)≈1+0⋅x+42x2f(x) \approx 1 + 0 \cdot x + \frac{4}{2}x^{2}
=1+2x2= 1 + 2x^{2}
To check your answer: using the standard expansion sec⁡u=1+12u2+…\sec u = 1 + \frac{1}{2}u^{2} + \ldots with u=2xu = 2x gives sec⁡2x=1+12(2x)2+…=1+2x2+…\sec 2x = 1 + \frac{1}{2}(2x)^{2} + \ldots = 1 + 2x^{2} + \ldots, matching the series above. ✓

∴sec⁡2x≈1+2x2\therefore\sec 2x \approx 1 + 2x^{2}, up to and including the term in x2x^{2}.

Part (ii)

Approach

replace sec⁡2x\sec 2x by the series just found and integrate the resulting polynomial term by term.

∫00.02sec⁡2x dx≈∫00.02(1+2x2)dx\int_{0}^{0.02}\sec 2x\, dx \approx \int_{0}^{0.02}\left( 1 + 2x^{2} \right)dx
=[x+23x3]00.02= \left\lbrack x + \frac{2}{3}x^{3} \right\rbrack_{0}^{0.02}
=0.02+23(0.02)3= 0.02 + \frac{2}{3}(0.02)^{3}
=0.0200053…= 0.0200053\ldots

∴∫00.02sec⁡2x dx≈0.02001\therefore\int_{0}^{0.02}\sec 2x\, dx \approx 0.02001, correct to 5 decimal places.

Part (iii)

3 marks

By GC,

∫00.02sec⁡2x dx=0.02001, correct to 5 decimal places\int_{0}^{0.02}\sec 2x\, dx = 0.02001,\ \text{correct to 5 decimal places}

Part (iv)

The estimate from (ii) and the calculator value from (iii) round to the same 0.020010.02001 to 5 decimal places; the unrounded values agree to about 8 significant figures, differing only by roughly 2×10−92 \times 10^{- 9}.

This is because the Maclaurin series was truncated after the x2x^{2} term, so the error in the approximation comes from the next term of the series, 103x4\frac{10}{3}x^{4}; integrating this over [0, 0.02]\lbrack 0,\ 0.02\rbrack contributes only 23(0.02)5≈2.13×10−9\frac{2}{3}(0.02)^{5} \approx 2.13 \times 10^{- 9} to the integral, which is negligible. Since x=0.02x = 0.02 is very close to 00, i.e. close to the point about which the series was expanded, the truncated series gives an excellent approximation to the true value.

Part (v)

1 mark

g(x)=cosec2x=1sin⁡2xg(x) = cosec2x = \frac{1}{\sin 2x} is not defined at x=0x = 0, since sin⁡0=0\sin 0 = 0 makes the denominator 00; in fact g(x)→±∞g(x) \rightarrow \pm \infty as x→0x \rightarrow 0. A Maclaurin series requires g(0)g(0) (and g′(0)g'(0), g′′(0)g''(0), …) to exist, so no Maclaurin series for gg can be found.

This is how we mark, and how we teach.

Every Ten-Year Series question, worked in full, with the reasoning written out and the traps named.

Find out more