dropping the modulus first, we write as , which exposes its asymptotes and monotonicity at once; then follows by reflecting the negative parts of above the -axis.
Writing ,
As , , so : has horizontal asymptote , so has horizontal asymptote . There is a vertical asymptote , where the denominator vanishes.
so is strictly increasing on each branch. Since , for and for ; and throughout , since as and as .
Taking : decreases from (as ) to , a cusp where changes sign, then increases from to as ; for , decreases from towards .
-intercept: , giving . -intercept: , giving .
To check your answer: , so , consistent with decreasing towards as ✓
asymptotes and ; axis intercepts and .
Part (b)
1 mark
From the sketch, the branch alone rises continuously from to , covering every value in .
range of .
Part (c)
1 mark
does not exist.
Explanation: for to exist, the range of must be a subset of the domain of . The domain of is all real except , but the range includes — e.g. — so is undefined.
Part (d)
1 mark
Explanation: from the sketch, decreases on and increases on , with a cusp (minimum) at . Restricting to keeps one-one, so that exists, only while the domain avoids containing both a decreasing and an increasing portion; the greatest such is where the turning point occurs.
Part (e)
4 marks
With domain restricted to , throughout, so .
Let and solve for in terms of .
Replacing by : .
The domain of equals the range of the restricted : on , and (not attained) as , so the range of the restricted is .
To check your answer: , matching ✓
, for .
This is how we mark, and how we teach.
Every Ten-Year Series question, worked in full, with the reasoning written out and the traps named.