2024 A-Level · Paper 1 · Question 10
A substitution is handed to you, a curve is sketched, and the region trapped between that curve and a horizontal line is first measured and then spun about the -axis. Below is the full solution — and beside it the region itself, filling as you sweep across it, and the solid turning in space.
Using the substitution , show that .
Approach
A substitution needs three separate pieces before the integrand is touched: the numerator in terms of , the denominator in terms of , and in terms of . Assemble all three first and the rewrite is mechanical; go hunting for them mid-line and something gets dropped.
Squaring the substitution and making the subject:
so the denominator becomes
Differentiating with respect to gives the third piece:
Putting the three together, with the numerator simply :
To check your answer:
At the substitution gives , and then , which is indeed . The rewritten denominator is right.
Sketch the curve for , giving intercepts and asymptotes, and shade the region .
Setting gives the -intercept:
There is no -intercept: needs , which is outside .
The denominator vanishes at while the numerator there is , so that is a vertical asymptote. For large ,
so is a horizontal asymptote, approached from above.
the curve meets the axes only at , with asymptotes and .
Note
sits between the curve above and below. Worth confirming that the curve really is the upper boundary across the whole strip: at it is and at it is , both comfortably above , and the curve is decreasing in between.
Find the exact area of , in the form .
Thought process
The region is the strip between two curves, so the area is the integral of the difference. Part (a) has already done the hard half of the work — but only for the curve, so take the two pieces separately: integrate the curve with the substitution, then subtract the rectangle underneath.
The region runs from to , between the curve and :
Splitting the integrand from part (a) into a proper fraction and using the standard result from MF27:
The limits change with the variable: gives , and gives .
The rectangle beneath the region has area , so
To check your answer:
— and the strip is roughly 6 wide by an average height of about 0.4, which is the same size. Sweep the region in the model and the running total lands on the same number.
the exact area of is , so , and .
Where the marks go
Change the limits when you change the variable. Leaving on an integral now written in is the single most common way this question is lost — the limits are and . And the answer wanted is exact: combine the two logarithms into one before writing it down, or the form is not met.
Find the volume of the solid generated when is rotated through radians about the -axis, to 2 decimal places.
Approach
Rotating a region that does not touch the axis leaves a hole down the middle. Each slice is a washer: a disc of radius the curve, with a disc of radius punched out of it. Its area is the difference of the two squares, and the volume is that summed along the strip.
The first term is improper as it stands, so force the numerator to show the denominator's factor — write :
Both pieces now integrate directly:
Evaluating between the limits:
To check your answer:
, so the bracket is and A rough sanity check: the solid is about 6 long with an outer radius averaging near 0.9 and a 0.5 hole, giving roughly — the right size. The hole itself is a plain cylinder all the way through, .
(2 d.p.).
The error that costs the whole part
is not the volume. That expression rotates the gap itself, which is a different solid altogether. The washer subtracts the squares — — and the two differ by worth of material.
Every Ten-Year Series question, worked in full — with the reasoning written out, the traps named, and the geometry you can actually turn around in your hands.