2024 A-Level · Paper 1 · Question 9
Two equations in a parameter trace a curve out of the origin. The first part finds its gradient and turns up something unusually convenient; the rest of the question spends it. Below is the full solution — and beside it the curve, with a point you can walk along it and the area filling underneath.
Show that for the curve , , , finding .
Approach
For a parametric curve the gradient is the ratio of the two rates, . Differentiate each equation separately and divide — there is no need to eliminate , and here trying to would be painful for no gain.
Differentiating each with respect to :
so the gradient of the curve is
To check your answer:
At both rates come to , so the gradient there is — which is , as claimed.
, so .
Note — what part (a) just handed you
The gradient is the parameter. Every question about the steepness of this curve now becomes a question about directly, with no solving to do. Walk the point along the curve in the model and watch the gradient readout track the slider exactly.
The tangent at a point makes an angle of with the -axis. Find the exact coordinates of .
A line at to the -axis has gradient , and by part (a) the gradient is :
Substituting into each parametric equation:
To check your answer:
, comfortably inside , and the point does sit on the curve between the origin and . Snap to it in the model and the tangent's angle reads .
.
Where the marks go
"Exact" rules out — the surds must survive to the answer line. And , not : cubing a surd is where this part quietly goes wrong.
The point lies on . Using calculus, find the exact area of the region bounded by , the -axis and the line through parallel to the -axis.
Thought process
The area under a curve is , but is not a function of here. Convert the whole integral to the parameter: , and the limits move from values of to values of . That means finding the parameter at first.
At the -coordinate is 16:
so or , and the second is rejected since .
To check your answer:
At , , which is the -coordinate of . The parameter is right.
Before integrating, note the shape: and for , so the curve climbs steadily from the origin to and stays above the -axis throughout. The area is therefore
Expanding first makes the integration routine:
To check your answer:
The region sits inside the rectangle from to , area 320, and the curve bulges below the diagonal, so something around a third of the rectangle is the right size. Fill the region in the model and the running total ends on the same value.
the exact area is units.
The two ways this part is lost
Forgetting the factor — is not an area — and leaving the limits as 0 and 16 after changing the variable to . Both give a tidy-looking number that is simply not the area.
Every Ten-Year Series question, worked in full — with the reasoning written out, the traps named, and the curves you can actually take hold of.