Part (a)(i)
3 marks
Let , for . Then
Since , this requires . Interchanging and ,
The domain of is the range of . Since for , , so the range of is .
, for , .
Part (a)(ii)
5 marks
Approach
we compute explicitly and set it equal to , then eliminate the two nested square roots by isolating and squaring twice in succession. Squaring can introduce extraneous roots, so this only shows the necessity of the cubic, which is all the question asks for.
Since ,
Setting :
Squaring both sides,
Squaring again,
Note: does not itself satisfy , since and ; it is an extraneous factor introduced by squaring. Any genuine solution therefore has , so it must satisfy the remaining factor:
By inspection, is a root of this cubic, so it factorises as
Solving by the quadratic formula gives .
Note that is exactly the equation obtained by solving directly: gives , and squaring gives , i.e. (valid since this needs , i.e. ). Of the two roots, only satisfies ; the other, , is rejected.
So satisfies .
Since , applying to both sides gives , i.e. . Combined with , this gives .
| To check your answer: ; since , this is , matching. ✓ |
Note: the other candidate, , is rejected, since but , so ; it is the extraneous root that entered when we squared to derive the cubic (indeed , so does not even satisfy ).
satisfies , because it is a fixed point of (so maps it to itself too).