Part (a)
1 markThe 65 respondents form a sample, not the population.
Explanation: the population here is all 90 members of the club (27 Youth 45 Adult 18 Senior), since the questionnaire was sent to every member. Only 65 of them replied, so these 65 are part — not all — of that group: a self-selected sample of the population, not the population itself.
Part (b)
1 markChoosing a random sample of members for the committee gives every member an equal chance of selection, so the committee is not biased by the secretary favouring particular members — it gives a fairer, more representative selection of opinion.
Part (c)
4 marksApproach
let , , be the numbers of Youth, Adult and Senior members on the committee, so with , , , and . Since is a strict majority-holder among only 6 members split three ways, we can simply list the few triples satisfying these constraints, rather than set up a general formula.
Listing all triples with , each at least , and , :
Case 1:
Case 2:
Case 3:
(every other combination fails or ).
Choosing each committee from the population of 27 Youth, 45 Adult and 18 Senior members,
Adding the three cases, the total number of committees satisfying all the stated constraints is
Of these, only Case 3 has (here ); Case 1 has and Case 2 has , so only Case 3 is favourable.
| To check your answer: simplifies exactly to ✓ |
(3 s.f.).